Institutional Innovation and crossborder governance in the U.S.-Mexico Border
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0719-09482023000100213Keywords:
Institucional innovation, Crossborder governance, Mobile borders, Borders and globalizationAbstract
This article analyzes institutional innovation based on four dimensions such as knowledge, bureaucracy, organization, and technology. The article uses a comparative analysis using three crossborder governance models such as territoriality, open borders and mobile; also multiple dimensions of innovation that take place in the U.S.-Mexico border. The comparative analysis is complemented by a content analysis. The article makes a couple of contributions to the current literature: One, innovation is analyzed critically and highlights that it does not always produce positive outcomes; there are questionable ethical issues as well. Second, the article points out that a sole crossboder governance model is no possible because the public agenda is very diverse and complex, so there are topics more conducive to cooperate and other not so much.
Downloads
References
Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53-80.
Alegría, T. (2011). Metrópolis transfronteriza: revisión de la hipótesis y evidencias de Tijuana, México y San Diego, Estados Unidos. Tijuana-México: Porrúa.
Aguilar, L. F. (2010). Gobernanza: El nuevo proceso de gobernar. México: Fundación Friedrich Naumann para la Libertad.
Balibar, E. (2009). Europe as borderland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(2), 190-215. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13008
Barrera, E. (2003). Aliens in heterotopia: an intertextual reading of the border patrol museum. En P. Vila (Ed.) Ethnography at the border (Vol. 13, pp. 166-181). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid Modernity. Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Bersin, A. D. (2012). Lines and flows: The beginning and end of borders. World Custom Journal, 6(1), 115-125.
Blanco, H. (1994). How to Think about Social Problems: American Pragmatism and The Idea of Planning. Westport: Praeger.
Bracamonte Sierra, Á. y Contreras, O. F. (2008). Redes globales de producción y proveedores locales: los empresarios sonorenses frente a la expansión de la industria automotriz. Estudios Fronterizos, 9(18), 161-194.
Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, 10(4), 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
Cappellano, F., Sohn, C., Makkonen, T. y Kaisto, V. (2022). Bringing borders back into cross-border regional innovation systems: Functions and dynamics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(5), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221073987
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. 1). Malden, MA.: Blackwell Publishers.
Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (2018). A Thousand Plateaus Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Denhardt, R. B. y Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Dilla Alfonso, H. (2015). Los complejos urbanos transfronterizos en América Latina. Estudios Fronterizos, 16(31), 15-38.
Ehrenberg, R. G. y Smith R. S. (2000). Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. Nueva York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.
Elden, S. (2013). The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Etzioni, E. (1964). Modern organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Faludi, A. (2018). The Poverty of Territorialism: A Neo-medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Foucault. M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Nueva York: Vintage Book.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, (16), 3-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184
Garrett, T. M. (2022). Border securocracy: Global expansion of the US Department of homeland security bureaucratic apparatus before, during and beyond covid-19. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 45(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2112454
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press.
Herzog, L. A. (1990). Where North Meets South: Cities, Space, and Politics on the United States-Mexico Border. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Herzog, L. A. y Sohn, C. (2014). The cross-border metropolis in a global age: A conceptual model and empirical evidence from the US–Mexico and European border regions. Global Society, 28(4), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2014.948539
Hooghe, L. y Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Johnson, C. y Jones, R. (2016). Where is the border. En R. Jones y C. Johnson (Eds.), Placing the Border in Everyday Life (pp. 1-11). Nueva York: Routledge.
Jones, R. (2012). Border Walls: Security and The War on Terror in the United States, India, and Israel. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lara, F. (2004). Gestión conjunta del medio ambiente fronterizo y TLC: cambio institucional, actores locales y redes transfronterizas. Región y Sociedad, 16(29), 75-107.
Lascurain, M. (2018). Teoría de regímenes internacionales: el caso del recurso agua en el régimen ambiental México-Estados Unidos. Si Somos Americanos. Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 18(2), 128-158.
Longo, M. (2017). The Politics of Borders: Sovereignty, Security, and The Citizen after 9/11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyon, D. (2013). The border is everywhere: ID cards, surveillance and the other. En E. Zuriek y M. Salter (Eds.), Global surveillance and policing: Borders, security, identity (pp. 78-94). Londres: Willan.
Martínez, O. J. (1994). Border People: Life and Society in the US-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Minghi, J. V. (1991). From conflict to harmony in border landscapes. En D. Rumley y J. V. Minghi (Eds.), The Geography of Border Landscapes (pp. 15-30). Nueva York: Routledge.
Mondardo, M. (2020). Descolonización de la frontera de Brasil con Paraguay: los guaraníes y kaiowá transfronterizos y las multitransterritorialidades de la lucha por el tekoha. Si Somos Americanos. Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos, 20(2), 161-185.
Mumme, S. P. y Moore, S. T. (1999). Innovation prospects in US-Mexico border water management: The IBWC and the BECC in theoretical perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17(6), 753-772. https://doi.org/10.1068/c170753
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
Newman, D. (2016). Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview. The Routledge Research Companion to Border Studies (pp. 55-70). Londres: Routledge.
Ochoa Espejo, P. (2020). On borders: Territories, Legitimacy, and The Rights of Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oddone, N. (2023). Paradiplomacy. [En línea]. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.797
Ó Tuathail, G. (1999). Borderless worlds? Problematising discourses of deterritorialisation, Geopolitics, 4(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650049908407644
Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282
París-Pombo, M. D. (2016). Trayectos peligrosos: inseguridad y movilidad humana en México. Papeles de Población, 22(90), 145-172.
Payan, T. (2007). Cops, Soldiers, and Diplomats: Explaining Agency Behavior in The War on Drugs. Lanham, Mayland: Lexington Books.
Payan, T. (24 de febrero de 2023). México-EU, ¿quién domina? Reforma. https://www.reforma.com/mexico-eu-quien-domina-2023-02-24/op244083
Peña. S. (2007). Cross‐border planning at the U.S.‐Mexico border: An institutional approach. Journal of Borderlands, 22(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2007.9695666
Peña, S. (2011). Regímenes de planificación transfronteriza: México-Estados Unidos. Región y Sociedad, 23(50), 115-151.
Peña, S. (2021). Movilidad transfronteriza, planeación y gobernanza en la frontera México-Estados Unidos: procesos y resultados. Gestión y Política Pública, 30(1): 1-30.
Peña, S. (2023). From territoriality to borderscapes: The conceptualisation of space in border studies. Geopolitics, 28(2), 766-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1973437
Rumford, C. (2006). Introduction: Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 155-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063330
Rumford, C. (2012). Towards a multiperspectival study of borders. Geopolitics, 17(4), 887-902. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.660584
Shachar, A. (2020). The Shifting Border: Legal Cartographies of Migration and Mobility. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Saint-Germain, M. A. (1995). Similarities and differences in perceptions of public service among public administrators on the US-Mexico border. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110341
Sassen, S. (2000). Territory and territoriality in the global economy. International Sociology, 15(2), 372-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002014
Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Pine Forgess Press.
Sassen, S. (2007). A Sociology of Globalization. Contemporary Societies. Nueva York: W.W. Norton Co.
Sassen, S. (2013). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Sohn, C. (2014). The border as a resource in the global urban space: A contribution to the cross‐border metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071
Szary, A. L. A. y Giraut, F. (2015). Borderities: The Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tapia Ladino, M. (2015). Frontera, movilidad y circulación reciente de peruanos y bolivianos en el norte de Chile. Estudios Atacameños, (50), 195-213.
Trippi, M. (2010). Developing cross‐border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101(2), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
Van Houtum, H. (2010). Mapping transversal borders: Towards a choreography of space. En B. Riccio y C. Brambilla. (Eds.), Transnational Migration, Cosmopolitanism and Dis-located Borders. Quaderni del C.E.R.CO 7 (pp. 119-138). Rimini, Italia: Guaraldi.
Van Houtum, H. (2012). The geopolitics of borders and boundaries. Geopolitics, 10(4), 672-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318522
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Londres: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Si Somos Americanos. Revista de Estudios Transfronterizos
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Si Somos Americanos agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, website or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Si Somos Americanos.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the work has been published in Si Somos Americanos.